<% 'pass = Request.Form("pass") IF ((Request.Form("pass") = 1) OR (Session("pass") = "pass")) THEN %> The Speculative Investor



   - Interim Update 9th November 2016

Copyright Reminder

The commentaries that appear at TSI may not be distributed, in full or in part, without our written permission. In particular, please note that the posting of extracts from TSI commentaries at other web sites or providing links to TSI commentaries at other web sites (for example, at discussion boards) without our written permission is prohibited.

We reserve the right to immediately terminate the subscription of any TSI subscriber who distributes the TSI commentaries without our written permission.

The Trump Victory

Our initial thoughts on the market-related consequences of Trump's election victory were in the email broadcast to subscribers early on Wednesday morning (US EST). As it turned out, the financial markets' reaction to the event was both correct and surprising.

It was correct in that the only market that became significantly more bullish or bearish as a result of Trump's success was the US Treasury market, which, as we mentioned in yesterday's email, would likely be affected in a significantly negative way. As illustrated below, the T-Bond tanked during Wednesday's US trading session. Furthermore, the T-Bond was the only major financial market to end Wednesday's US trading session with a big gain or loss.

However, the financial world's reaction was also surprising. This is because we expected that there would be a sharp 1-2 day decline in the stock market and rise in the gold price due to the uncertainty created by the generally-unanticipated event, and that stock market weakness could support the T-Bond in the near-term.

In any case, it's too soon to draw any conclusions. The initial reaction may well have been appropriate, but the T-Bond is now extremely 'oversold' on a short-term basis and the stock indices still need to confirm their recent signs of strength by ending this week above certain numbers.



Copper breakout or fakeout?

The copper price has risen sharply and has decisively breached resistance in the low-$2.30s. Does this mark the beginning of a major upward trend?

Possibly. After all, while a sustained breakout at this time wouldn't fit with our short-term expectation it would certainly be consistent with our overarching expectation that the coming 1-2 years was going to be a very bullish period for commodity prices. By the way, to confirm the upside breakout the copper price must end the week above the March high of $2.33.

But regardless of the longer-term significance of this week's performance by the copper price it should be taken into account that the copper market is now extremely 'overbought' on a short-term basis. In particular, an extraordinary 13-day winning streak has resulted in the daily RSI (refer to the bottom section of the following chart) reaching its highest level in more than 10 years. Furthermore, as we write the price is up an additional 8c (at $2.54), so the market is working on its 14th consecutive up-day. This probably means that even if a long-term shift has occurred there will soon be a 'correction' that takes the price down to the vicinity of the rising 50-day MA.



The best and worst places in the world for mining

Australia is the lowest-risk country in the world for mining. Specifically, a well-managed mining company is less likely to encounter a project-threatening political, legal, environmental or community-relations obstacle in Australia than in any other country. Furthermore, the geology in many parts of Australia is conducive to economic mineral deposits.

That being said, in large countries such as Australia, the US and Canada, some areas will be much less risky than others for mining investment. This is due to state/province/area-specific permitting and community-relations issues. In Australia, for example, Western Australia is the best state for mining investment from a political/legal/environmental risk perspective. This is partly because a mining culture permeates the state. It is also because the interesting mineral deposits tend to be located in the middle of nowhere.

Our opinion regarding the relative attractiveness of mining in Australia is based on our experiences investing in mining companies over the past two decades, but our opinion on this matter is not an outlier.

According to the Fraser Institute's most recent annual survey of mining companies, Western Australia is the number-one jurisdiction in the world for mining investment taking into account policy and geology. The rest of the top 10 are Saskatchewan, Nevada, Ireland, Finland, Alaska, Northern Territory, Quebec, Utah, and South Australia. The list of the best 10 jurisdictions for mining investment therefore contains three Australian states/territories, three Canadian provinces, three US states and (surprisingly) Ireland.

The same survey lists the bottom 10 jurisdictions for mining investment (beginning with the worst) as La Rioja (Argentina), Venezuela, Honduras, Greece, Solomon Islands, Chubut (Argentina), Guinea, Kenya, Mendoza (Argentina), and Rio Negro (Argentina). In other words, four Argentine provinces made the list of the world's ten WORST jurisdictions for mining investment.

Given that Argentina, with its new government, is supposedly now open for business, some of our readers are probably surprised that Argentine provinces scored so poorly in the Fraser Institute's latest survey. However, Argentina is the best example of a country where it makes no sense to generalise about the attractiveness of mining investment. Some Argentine provinces are open to mining investment, some are almost completely closed and others are somewhere in between. Before buying the shares of a mining company with a project in Argentina, make sure you understand the local situation.


The Stock Market

The US

In after-hours trading on Tuesday night in the US (Wednesday morning in Asia) the price of the December S&P500 futures contract traded as low as 2028. This means that the futures market came within about 1% of the short-term downside target we've had in mind for the past couple of months. However, by the time the cash market opened on Wednesday morning in the US almost all of the losses had been recouped. This means that only traders in the futures markets and traders in Asian markets were able to take full advantage of the election-related volatility.

The cash S&P500 never traded lower than 2125 and after some minor initial weakness began to rally. At the end of the day it had not only managed to hold above the 2120 demarcation level, it had broken above the top of its short-term price channel.



More importantly, the Dow Transportation Average (TRAN) has clearly broken above intermediate-term lateral resistance at 8150.



The 'stock market' appears to have re-thought the situation and concluded that Trump's victory is bullish for equities. Actually, it is neither bullish nor bearish. If the stock market can maintain or extend its high valuation it will be because of a ramp-up in the rate of monetary inflation, not because of anything the government does. In other words, the Fed and the commercial banks possibly have the power to extend the bull market. However, they could only do so by creating even greater valuation-related downside risk.

Finally, we'll repeat what we wrote in the email that was sent to subscribers after the close of Monday's trading session:

"Regardless of what happens over the coming 1-2 days, what will really matter is where the various markets/indices finish the week. For example, the Dow Transportation Average (TRAN), which broke out to the upside and made a new high for the year on Monday, needs to end the week above 8150 to confirm Monday's upside breakout. A failure to end the week above 8150 would generate a reliable bearish signal. For another example, the S&P500 Index, which moved back above the 2120 breakdown level on Monday, must end this week above 2120 to confirm that a short-term bottom was put in place last week."


Gold and the Dollar

Gold

As soon as it began to look like Trump might win the election the gold price shot upward. However, most of the price gain had been given back by the time the US markets opened for trading on Wednesday and the rest of the gain had evaporated by the time the US markets closed.

If Clinton had won we suspect that the price action would have been the opposite, with the gold price initially spiking downward and then reversing. A downward spike following a Clinton win could have created a good short-term buying opportunity in the gold market, but it wasn't to be.



We don't view gold's post-election price reversal as bearish. It actually hasn't changed our expectations at all. We continue to expect that the US$ gold price will spend the bulk of the next two months in the $1250-$1300 range, with moves outside this range proving to be short-lived.

For reasons unrelated to the goings-on in the US there has been panic-buying of gold in India over the past two days, with gold apparently trading as high as US$3,000/oz at one point. The story is told in Jayant Bhandari's article at http://www.acting-man.com/?p=47768.

Gold Stocks

Wednesday 9th November was the fourth time in the past seven trading days that the HUI traded above resistance at 220 and then reversed course. On Wednesday it traded as high as 222 in the early-going, but ended the day at 212.

Our opinion continues to be that a short-term bottom was put in place in early-October, but a daily close above 220 is needed to remove any remaining doubt.



Although it is supposed to be a gold-stock index, the XAU has copper producer Freeport McMoran (FCX) as one of its largest components. As a consequence, the XAU tends to do well relative to the HUI during periods when the copper market is much stronger than the gold market. The past two weeks has been such a period, which is why the XAU's short-term chart pattern currently looks more bullish than the HUI's short-term chart pattern.

Like the HUI, the XAU hasn't yet managed to close above resistance defined by its early-September low. However, the XAU ended Wednesday's session right at this resistance whereas the HUI ended the session more than 3% below it. Also, the XAU has broken above the top of its 3-month price channel (refer to the following daily chart for details) whereas the HUI remains below the top of a similar channel.



Some weakness in the gold-mining indices over the coming 1-2 days could create a good short-term trading opportunity, but at this time the right approach for most investors with sizable cash reserves is to simply pick away at gold-mining stocks that offer reasonable value.

The Currency Market

The Mexican Peso

Over the past few months the Mexican peso's performance relative to the US$ has been strongly correlated with expectations regarding Trump's chances of electoral success. On days when it seemed like Trump's chances were improving, the USD/MXN exchange rate rose (meaning: the peso weakened); and on days when it seemed like Trump was losing ground, the USD/MXN exchange rate fell (meaning: the peso strengthened).

As illustrated by the following daily chart of USD/MXN, the peso began to strengthen late last week and was very strong over the first two days of this week as the markets became confident that Clinton was going to win. USD/MXN then rocketed to an all-time high (meaning: the peso plummeted to an all-time low relative to the US$) in reaction to Trump's victory. Interestingly, however, USD/MXN wasn't able to end the day in new-high territory.

We have no desire whatsoever to be 'long' the Mexican peso. However, Trump's election victory doesn't materially alter the peso's fundamentals, so it won't surprise us if the peso's dramatic spike in reaction to the election news created an intermediate-term extreme.



The Canadian Peso

The Mexican peso was worth mentioning because of its huge move in reaction to the election news. The Canadian peso (or dollar, as it's usually called) is worth mentioning for the opposite reason.

The C$ has hardly moved at all over the past few days. Instead, it has been trading in a narrow range near support at 74.5.

The C$'s on-going lethargy is a reason to suspect that there will be significant additional weakness in the oil price following a short rebound.



Updates on Stock Selections

Notes: 1) To review the complete list of current TSI stock selections, logon at http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/market_logon.asp and then click on "Stock Selections" in the menu. When at the Stock Selections page, click on a stock's symbol to bring-up an archive of our comments on the stock in question. 2) The Small Stock Watch List is located at http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/smallstockwatch.html

Removing the Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) from the TSI List

We have removed COPX from the TSI List. It is only up by around 6% since our poorly-timed entry in July of last year, but it is up by 66% since the beginning of this year and is now stretched to the upside on a short-term basis.

COPX will possibly return to the TSI List within the coming few months, although we would prefer to add the stocks of one or two individual copper-mining companies than an ETF containing a hotchpotch of companies.

The TSI List still has exposure to copper via TGB, IVN.TO and ESM.TO.


Chart Sources

Charts appearing in today's commentary are courtesy of:


http://stockcharts.com/index.html

<% Session("pass") = "pass" Session.Timeout = 480 ELSE Response.Redirect "market_logon.asp" END IF %>