<% 'pass = Request.Form("pass") IF ((Request.Form("pass") = 1) OR (Session("pass") = "pass")) THEN %> Speculative-Investor.com

    - Interim Update 16th April 2008

Copyright Reminder

The commentaries that appear at TSI may not be distributed, in full or in part, without our written permission. In particular, please note that the posting of extracts from TSI commentaries at other web sites or providing links to TSI commentaries at other web sites (for example, at discussion boards) without our written permission is prohibited.

We reserve the right to immediately terminate the subscription of any TSI subscriber who distributes the TSI commentaries without our written permission.

The Decade Cycle (a.k.a. the rolling bubble)

Since the birth of the floating (sinking?) currency regime at the beginning of the 1970s, the best bull market of any decade has always continued until the beginning of the next decade. To help illustrate what we are talking about we present, below, three charts that represent the best bull markets of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, respectively.

The best (most powerful) bull market of the 1970s was in commodities, with a particular focus on precious metals and oil. Therefore, for the first of our charts we have chosen one that shows gold's performance during the 1970s and the first three years of the 1980s.


The next decade (the 1980s) was dominated by Japan, so our second chart shows how the Nikkei225 Index performed throughout this decade and during the first three years of the 1990s.


Finally, the best bull market of the 1990s was in the US, with a particular focus on the NASDAQ. Our third chart therefore reveals the NASDAQ's performance during this decade and the first three years of the ensuing (current) decade.


Notice that in each case the bull market continued until January-March of the 'zero year' -- January-1980 for gold, January-1990 for the Nikkei, and March-2000 for the NASDAQ -- and there was a very strong advance during the final 12-18 months of the decade. This could have relevance to the present day given that we are close to entering the final 18 months of the decade.

The best bull market of the current decade has been in commodities, with a particular focus on metals and energy. The emerging-market bull is running a close second. The "Decade Cycle" defined above therefore projects a lot more strength in the commodity world between now and the end of 2009.

We are positioned for the aforementioned strength, although we expect a shakeout to occur before the final advance gets underway.

By the way, the best bull market of the next decade will probably also be in gold and commodities. This is because long-term bull markets never end until gross over-valuation is achieved, and gross over-valuation is unlikely to be achieved within the next 2 years. During the next decade there should, however, be more emphasis on gold than on the industrial commodities because by then the defective nature of the official money will be more widely understood.

Oil and Gas

A divergence grows bigger

The oil price and the Canadian Dollar have trended together for at least the past 13 years. There have been a few multi-month periods when the two markets went their separate ways, but they always ended up moving back into line with each other. Up until now there have been no really major divergences, although if the current divergence continues to build it will soon reach the "major" category.

The following chart shows that oil and the C$ trended relentlessly higher between January and November of last year, but after peaking together in November they took very different paths. Specifically, the C$ embarked on an intermediate-term correction whereas the oil market, after pulling back for a few weeks following its November peak, quickly returned to its steeply-sloped upward path.



We have been assuming that the divergence illustrated above would eventually be closed via a decline in the oil price rather than via a rise in the C$, but the relentless nature of oil's advance certainly has us contemplating other possibilities. One possibility is that the oil market has been discounting the increasing likelihood of another war in the Middle East. This would explain the expanding divergence between oil and the C$, although such a scenario is not consistent with the recent downturn in the gold market or the increasingly constructive price action throughout the stock market. The anticipation of war therefore doesn't appear to be the primary reason behind oil's impressive strength.

The primary reason appears to be the US dollar's weakness relative to the euro. The following chart shows that oil and the euro remain 'joined at the hip', so with the euro continuing to make new highs against the US$ it makes a modicum of sense that oil is also continuing to make new highs. Oil, it seems, has temporarily taken over from gold as the preferred currency hedge within the commodity world. This is a situation that won't last, but it explains why oil keeps pushing upward. What is more difficult to explain, for those of us who look at the euro's negatives as well as the US dollar's negatives, is why the euro keeps making new highs against the dollar.



Our GUESS is that both the euro and oil are very close to peaks in terms of price and time, but we wouldn't bet against either market until price action began to substantiate this guess. A preliminary, but likely meaningful, indication of a trend change would be a daily close below the 18-day moving average by the June euro futures contract. This moving average is presently at 1.5711 and is rising each day.

Quick note on natural gas

Natural gas (NG), a form of energy that we have been very bullish on, continues to do well. The market action suggests a short-term target of $11-$12 (about 10% above the current price), but as noted in an earlier commentary we expect that there will be a peak by May followed by a pullback into the July-September timeframe. We therefore continue to believe that it will make sense to scale out of NG trading positions into strength over the next few weeks.

Scaling in and out of positions is what we almost always do in the management of own money, but the TSI Stocks List is not run like a portfolio -- it is a list of investing and trading ideas, not a portfolio -- and therefore doesn't, in general, reflect money management tactics/discipline. Rather than scaling in and out of positions in order to minimise timing risk, when it comes to making an addition to or a deletion from the List we have to pick our spot.

Further to the above, we have decided to exit our Chesapeake Energy (CHK) January-2009 $40 call options. The profit on the trade, based on Wednesday's closing price of US$13.50 and our 16th January entry price of US$4.40, was 207%.

The Stock Market

Current Market Situation

The following chart shows the resistance at 12750 that has capped rallies in the Dow Industrial Index over the past three months. Our impression is that the Dow is 'coiling' in preparation for a break above this resistance. Note that such a breakout would project a test of last year's peak.


Interestingly, the Dow Transportation Average, which has been a relative strength leader since January, has already broken out to the upside (refer to the following chart for details). It looks like the Transportation Average is on its way to a new all-time high.


As far as our short-term bullish view is concerned, the one significant issue is the lack of inter-market confirmation of the US stock market's rebound. In particular, for the rebound to have any real staying power it should eventually be confirmed by an upward reversal in the US$.

Gold and the Dollar

Gold Stocks

The bearish interpretation of the following chart is that the HUI is in the process of completing the "right shoulder" of a "head-and-shoulders" top, while the bullish interpretation is that the recent sharp drop from 520 to 420 was "all she wrote" as far as the downward correction is concerned. Depending on which interpretation is correct, there is either going to be a large advance or a large decline over the coming 4 weeks. Either way, it will be an interesting time!

We think the odds are slightly in favour of the latter outcome, which would entail a decline to a May-June low followed by an upward trend that should, based on the "Decade Cycle", extend through to the end of NEXT year. We are positioned for this upward trend, not the decline that will possibly precede it, but in our own account we have begun to take some precautionary measures due to the near-term risk of a slump in our favourite stock-market sector.

In recent commentaries we mentioned that we would view a HUI rebound to around 480 as an opportunity to either take some money off the 'golden table' or buy some insurance in the form of GDX put options. This opportunity is now presenting itself, so we have begun to average into some GDX and PAAS June-July put options (the purpose of the PAAS puts is to hedge our silver exposure). If the gold sector ramps upward over the next few weeks -- in our opinion a lower-probability outcome, but certainly not a long shot -- then we will have wasted our money on these puts in the same way that we waste money on fire insurance every year that our house doesn't burn down.

By the way, a strong upward move to a May or June peak (the lower-probability outcome) would probably be followed by a sharp downward correction to an October-November low and then a powerful rally through to the end of next year.


As we've noted in many previous commentaries, over the past year Royal Gold (RGLD) has been a better proxy for the overall gold sector than popular gold-stock indices such as the HUI and the XAU. The following chart shows that RGLD has made a sequence of declining tops since early 2006, with the most recent top of significance at around $35.

A daily close above $35 would therefore paint a very bullish short-term picture. However, the most likely short-term scenario is that RGLD tops below $34 within the next several days and then drops back to near the bottom of its consolidation range (the low-$20s) over the ensuing 1-2 months.


Update on Stock Selections

(Note: To review the complete list of current TSI stock selections, logon at http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/market_logon.asp and then click on "Stock Selections" in the menu. When at the Stock Selections page, click on a stock's symbol to bring-up an archive of our comments on the stock in question)

Fairborne Energy (TSX: FEL). Shares: 83M issued. Recent price: C$8.47

Natural gas producer FEL was originally part of our 'gassy' energy trust position (the TSI Energy Trust Index - TETI), but last December it converted itself into an exploration and production (E&P) company. This forced us to remove FEL from our energy trust index and crystallise a loss, but our view was that at the absurdly low price at which it was trading at the time it made no sense to sell FEL. This was especially so given that the outlook for natural gas looked bullish and that a private equity firm had recently paid C$7.45/share for a substantial stake in the company. We therefore made FEL a separate position in the TSI Stocks List, noting that: "At the current natural gas price we think fair value for FEL is around C$7-C$8 per share, so buyers near Friday's closing price of C$5.61 are, in our opinion, getting a very good deal."

Our decision to add FEL to the List as a separate position following its conversion from a trust to an E&P company has paid off in that the stock price has since gained about 50%. It's now time to think about where we should make our exit.

With reference to the following chart, the recent break above intermediate-term resistance at C$8 projects additional gains up to resistance in the $10-$11 range. We don't know if this range will be reached within the coming month, but if it is then we will grab the opportunity to make at least a partial exit. In fact, we think it will make sense to start scaling out in the mid-C$9 area.


    Intel (INTC) January-2009 $25 Call Options

About three months ago we added an Intel call option position to the TSI List to reflect our view that the tech sector of the market was close to an important low. After being underwater for a while, this INTC position of ours is now starting to look reasonable.

As evidenced by the following chart, INTC is currently testing resistance at around $22. A daily close above $22.50 would suggest that a move up to $24, or perhaps even $26, was 'on the cards'.

As far as the TSI Stocks List is concerned our plan is to exit the call option position if the stock trades at $24. As far as our own account is concerned the plan is to scale out between $24 and $26.


    Patriot Coal (NYSE: PCX). Shares: 26.5M. Recent price: US$64.21

We most recently highlighted PCX as a buy on 19th March, when it was trading at around $41, and on 2nd April, when it was trading at $47. It has since moved up to the mid-$60s.

We suspect that PCX will become a triple-digit stock within the coming 12 months, so we do not think that a great profit-taking opportunity is at hand. We did want to point out, though, that the stock has risen to near the top of its short-term price channel (see chart below). As a result, those with heavy exposure could consider partial profit-taking at this time.

When managing our own money we regularly trade around a core position -- taking some money off the table when a long-term holding becomes overbought and then boosting our exposure following a pullback. The risk with this strategy is that sometimes the stock ends up going much higher before the inevitable pullback occurs. This is a risk we are usually prepared to take.


    European Minerals (TSX: EPM). Shares: 304M issued, 457M fully diluted. Recent price: C$0.89

We concluded our 7th April update on emerging gold/copper miner EPM by saying: "IF we are only dealing with a delay of a few months to project commissioning and deliveries into the hedge book can be adjusted to fit the revised commissioning timetable then EPM is a strong buy near Friday's closing price [of C$0.89]. The problem is, we can't be certain that this is the case. At this time it is therefore not possible for us to make a definitive buy or sell recommendation."

Earlier this week some more information on EPM's current situation became available thanks to the publishing of the company's MD&A (Management Discussion and Analysis) for the December quarter. Unfortunately, though, the MD&A raised as many questions as it answered.

What we now know is that EPM had $25M of cash at the end of last year, $6M of which was used during the first quarter of this year to settle the forward sales contracts that, due to project delays, could not be settled by delivering gold bullion. The company would also have spent money on project commissioning over the past few months, so cash on hand at this time is probably no more than $15M. This is nowhere near enough to see the company through to the commencement of commercial production -- now expected to occur in September -- given that: a) loan repayments totaling around $18M are due on 30th June, b) other forward sales contracts might have to be settled in cash, and c) commissioning costs will continue to be incurred. Therefore, EPM will have to come to an agreement with its lenders to re-schedule loan repayments and deliveries into forward sales contracts so that they line up with the revised production schedule, or arrange additional financing of at least $30M.

We think that EPM will get through this rough period mostly intact, although there is a good chance that the share count will rise by another 10-15% between now and when the company becomes cash flow positive. In any case, we would not do any new buying of the stock until a solution to the immediate financial issues is in place.

We have always been very much against the practice of forward selling by mining companies because the only reason we ever want to own the shares of these companies is to obtain leveraged exposure to the anticipated upside in metal prices. However, we have been prepared to stick with EPM because we thought -- and continue to think -- that its eventual production levels would be high relative to the amount of price-capped production (the company forward-sold 50% of the currently planned production as part of a debt package, but substantial production growth is likely over the coming years).

It's beginning to look like sticking with EPM was a mistake, though, because we are now being given a clear demonstration of the risk that a small single-project mining company accepts when it finances project construction via the combination of debt and forward selling (some hedging of future production is normally a prerequisite when a mining company with no current revenue takes on significant debt). Financing a large chunk of the mine construction cost in this way minimises stock dilution, but it greatly increases the potential adverse impact of project delays and, therefore, the risk.

Chart Sources

Charts appearing in today's commentary are courtesy of:

http://stockcharts.com/index.html
http://www.futuresource.com/
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/

 
Copyright 2000-2008 speculative-investor.com
<% Session("pass") = "pass" Session.Timeout = 480 ELSE Response.Redirect "market_logon.asp" END IF %>