<% 'pass = Request.Form("pass") IF ((Request.Form("pass") = 1) OR (Session("pass") = "pass")) THEN %> The Speculative Investor



   - Interim Update 20th July 2016

Copyright Reminder

The commentaries that appear at TSI may not be distributed, in full or in part, without our written permission. In particular, please note that the posting of extracts from TSI commentaries at other web sites or providing links to TSI commentaries at other web sites (for example, at discussion boards) without our written permission is prohibited.

We reserve the right to immediately terminate the subscription of any TSI subscriber who distributes the TSI commentaries without our written permission.

Early signs of an "inflation" wave

When the 'shocking' news hit the wires that the UK had voted to leave the EU, the gold price rocketed upward and senior stock indices such as the S&P500 (SPX) tanked. This was a typical and predictable knee-jerk reaction to the news. When the panic subsided after a couple of days and speculators came to terms with the reality that "Brexit" was nothing to be afraid of (as long as you weren't a politician or bureaucrat relying on an expansion of EU powers), the senior stock indices quickly recouped their news-related losses. However, the gold price not only retained all of its news-related gains, it actually managed a new high for the year before commencing a downward correction. This rather strange performance by the gold market could be an early warning of an important shift in the financial markets.

The ability of gold to make new highs for the year in the face of strength in the broad stock market is part of a shift that got underway shortly after the SPX bottomed in February. Gold had benefited from the increasing risk aversion associated with the December-February stock-market decline, but after the stock market reversed upward on 11th February the gold market remained in its nascent upward trend.

To further explain, based on how the gold and stock markets generally traded relative to each other over the past few years it would have been normal if February's upward reversal in the stock market had been accompanied by the resumption of gold's cyclical bear market. We are referring to the fact that, as illustrated by the following chart, from April of 2011 through to February of 2016 the stock and gold markets trended in opposite directions most of the time. Instead, when the stock market reversed upward in February the US$ gold price traded sideways for a while before resuming the advance that began in December



It's too soon to tell if what we've seen from the gold and stock markets over the past few months is part of a new major trend or just a short-term divergence from the relationship of the past few years. After all, there were other multi-month periods over the past five years when the stock and gold markets rallied together, but in each case the inverse relationship subsequently reasserted itself. We just wanted to highlight the possibility that the financial world has entered a 1-3 year period during which the overarching correlation between gold and equities is positive.

A 1-3 year period during which the stock and gold markets rally together seems to require inflation expectations that are low and rising, that is, a general expectation that there will be more "inflation", but not so much that it creates a major problem.


No "Brexit" after all?

There are hints that the UK's government is backsliding with regard to its commitment, following the recent referendum, to get the UK out of the European Union (EU).

We certainly aren't experts on British politics, so perhaps we are misreading the situation. However, Theresa May, the country's new Prime Minister, recently stated that Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty (the article that must be 'triggered' to formally begin the separation negotiations) would not be triggered until after Brexit has Scotland's backing. Since the Scottish people as a group are very much against Brexit, this is akin to saying that Brexit will probably not happen.

For Britain's sake, hopefully we are misreading the situation. Staying in the EU after having voted to leave would be worse than having voted to stay. It would indicate that the referendum was a charade.


The Stock Market

The US

The S&P500 Index (SPX) moved a little further into new-high territory over the first three days of this week. There is no evidence that a major top is close at hand or that a substantial downward trend is about to begin, but a 1-2 week decline/consolidation is likely from whatever high is made this week.

We will be interested to see if there's enough strength in the overall market prior to the start of a correction to push the Dow Transportation Average (TRAN) above resistance.

TRAN has trend-line resistance very near its current price, but the most important nearby resistance is defined by the April high (8150). An ability to close above this resistance, even if only for a single day, would remove a bearish non-confirmation -- one of the few remaining pieces of evidence supporting the short-term bearish case.



The performance of market internals during the coming 1-2 week decline/consolidation should be informative. For example, it would be reasonable to expect that if a near-term decline does NOT result in a large increase in the number of individual stocks making new 12-month lows then it will be followed by rally to new SPX highs.


Gold and the Dollar

Gold

The Fundamentals

It's appropriate to reprint the following comments from the 4th July Weekly Update, because they explain why the gold market has weakened of late:

"Today's gold-bullish fundamental backdrop has a lot to do with the expected actions of the Fed. This is because in addition to influencing inflation expectations and nominal bond yields, the Fed's expected moves on the interest rate front now directly affect the relative strength of the banking sector (bank stocks now get a boost when the expected level of the Fed Funds (FF) rate rises due to the fact that the Fed now implements hikes in the Funds rate by increasing the interest rate it pays the banks on their reserves).

The expected actions of the Fed have undergone an extraordinary change since early-June. Since then not only has the market given up on a Fed rate hike over the remainder of 2016, it now expects that the Fed will essentially be on hold until at least 2018! We know this because the following chart of the January-2018 Fed Funds Futures (FFF) contract shows that the expected level of the FF rate in January-2018 is 0.51% (the FF rate implied by the futures contract is 100 minus the futures price), which is only about 0.13% above the current FF rate. To put it another way, the market currently thinks that there is no chance of a Fed rate hike over the remainder of 2016 and that there will, at MOST, be a single 0.25% rate hike during the course of 2017.
"

After showing a chart of the January-2018 FFF contract, we went on to say:

"What makes the change in the expected actions of the Fed so extraordinary is that it happened in parallel with no net change in the stock market and no significant deterioration in the economy (the economy is lacklustre, but no more so today than a month ago). The fact that there appears to be minimal justification for the change of the past few weeks means that there is the potential for a quick change in the opposite direction. All it would possibly take to set such a change in motion is a stronger-than-expected employment report (the next monthly employment report will be published on Friday 8th July) or an upside breakout by the S&P500 Index.

We therefore view the fundamental backdrop as currently being skewed in gold's favour, but in such a way that it would take a relatively small change in the data to tip the balance from bullish to bearish.
"

Since then we've had a stronger-than-expected employment report AND an upside breakout by the S&P500 Index. As illustrated by the updated chart of the January-2018 FFF contract displayed below, this has caused a small but significant shift in market expectations regarding the actions of the Fed. The huge quantity of traders known as 'the market' now collectively believes that there is a 100% chance of at least one 0.25% Fed rate hike by the end of next year and a 25% chance of two 0.25% Fed rate hikes by the end of next year. Furthermore (but not indicated on the following chart), after being totally convinced three weeks ago that there would be no Fed rate hikes this year 'the market' is now assigning a roughly 50% probability to a rate hike before year-end.



The recent shift in the expected actions of the Fed hasn't been sufficient to tip the fundamental backdrop to gold-bearish. It's now best described as gold-neutral. However, it would probably take only a small additional increase in market expectations regarding the Fed's targeted interest rate to push the fundamental backdrop into gold-bearish territory.

It certainly isn't normal for minor changes in expectations regarding the Fed Funds rate to have a meaningful effect on gold's true fundamentals, but it's happening now. This is because the entire financial world has come to be dominated by monetary policy.

The Price Action

It's not just the fundamental backdrop that is being influenced to an unusually-large degree by guesses regarding future monetary policy. Also of significance is that gold's price action since February of this year has been dominated by speculators in the futures market and these speculators have, as a group, been buying/selling in response to small changes in the expected actions of the Fed. Of particular relevance, the build-up of the largest-ever speculative net-long position in gold futures was mostly fueled by the belief that the Fed would take no further actions to tighten monetary conditions for a very long time to come. Anything that calls this belief into question is therefore going to provoke some speculative long-liquidation.

There has obviously been some speculative long-liquidation over the past two weeks. The amount hasn't yet been sufficient to do much 'technical' damage, but an early warning signal was generated on Wednesday 20th July. The early warning signal was a daily close below the 20-day MA following four consecutive trading days on which this MA was successfully tested.

Trend-defining support for the short-term and the intermediate-term trends lies at US$1308. This support needs to be breached on a daily closing basis to signal a downward reversal of the short-term trend and on a weekly closing basis to signal a downward reversal of the intermediate-term trend.



Gold Stocks

The HUI's recent price action has been unusual. It peaked in early-July and then moved sideways in a very narrow range for nine days. A sideways move that follows a large rally will typically end via an extension of the rally; however, this type of sideways move usually doesn't last as long as nine days. As all of our readers are undoubtedly aware, the unusually-long sideways move ended in a sharp decline on Wednesday 20th July.

As is the case with gold bullion, Wednesday's decline didn't do much damage to the HUI's chart but it did result in a daily close below the 20-day MA. It should therefore be viewed as an early warning that a more serious correction -- more serious, that is, than anything we've seen over the past 6 months -- has begun.

Trend-defining support for the HUI lies at 235-240. If this support is breached on a daily closing basis it will probably mean that a multi-month top is in place.



It is worth mentioning that even if the senior gold-stock indices (the HUI and the XAU) have peaked for the year, many junior gold-mining stocks will probably make new highs for the year over the next couple of months. At least, that's what happened during 2001-2010 following intermediate-term peaks in the gold-stock indices.

The Currency Market

The Dollar Index has finally broken above its 200-day MA and the top of its post-Brexit trading range, but the euro hasn't yet managed to break below the bottom of its post-Brexit range. We expect that it will do so in the near future.



Updates on Stock Selections

Notes: 1) To review the complete list of current TSI stock selections, logon at http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/market_logon.asp and then click on "Stock Selections" in the menu. When at the Stock Selections page, click on a stock's symbol to bring-up an archive of our comments on the stock in question. 2) The Small Stock Watch List is located at http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/smallstockwatch.html

New TSI stock selection: Alkane Resources (ASX: ALK, USOTC: ANLKY). Shares: 497M. Recent price: A$0.215

We've been keeping an eye on ALK since it was brought to our attention by a TSI reader a few months ago. It appeared to offer good value, but the story was complex and involved commodity markets (rare earths and other specialty metals) that we didn't understand. We still don't have a good understanding of the commodity markets that will ultimately be the difference between ALK being a huge success or dead money, but we no longer view such an understanding as a prerequisite for having a very positive opinion of the stock's prospects. There are two reasons, the first (and foremost) of which is that the current market cap assigns zero value to the company's potentially-high-value "specialty metals" project. The second is that people who do understand the markets for specialty metals have given their stamp of approval to ALK's associated project.

ALK's most important asset is the Dubbo Zirconia Project (DZP) located in central New South Wales (Australia). This project hosts a large mineral resource comprising various REEs (Rare Earth Elements), Zirconium, Niobium and Hafnium. For discussion purposes we'll lump these elements together under the "specialty metals" label, but the markets (the end uses and global supply situations) of each element are different.

A feasibility-level engineering study completed in August of last year estimated an IRR and NPV of 17.5% and US$1B, resp., near current commodity prices. Furthermore, the DZP is fully-permitted and construction-ready. However, the engineering study also estimated an initial capex of almost US$1B. The initial capex probably represents an insurmountable obstacle at current commodity prices, but the project could well be 'financeable' at higher commodity prices.

We noted, above, that ALK's "specialty metals" project is currently being assigned no value by the stock market. We say this because in addition to the development-stage DZP, ALK has other assets with a combined value of more than its current A$100M market cap. These assets are A$30M of cash and a gold mine with 70K-ounces/year of profitable production.

ALK's Tomingley gold project, which is also located in central New South Wales, has a short mine life and should therefore be assigned a relatively low valuation, but the present valuation is unreasonably low considering what has happened to the prices of gold and gold-mining equities over the past 12 months. Based on the valuations being assigned to other Australia-based gold miners with relatively short mine lives and similar operating costs (Tomingley's AISC is around US$940/oz), we estimate fair value for the Tomingley project to be US$90M (A$120M).

By our reckoning, therefore, ALK has assets in addition to the DZP that are worth roughly A$150M, or 50% more than the company's current market cap. That's why we don't need a good understanding of the "specialty metals" markets to figure out that ALK's risk/reward is very attractive. We can be confident that the DZP has significant value and we can be certain that it doesn't have negative value.

We also noted above that people who do understand the markets for specialty metals have given their stamp of approval to the DZP. This comment was in reference to a detailed report put out by Hallgarten and Co. early this week.

The following chart shows the massive (1000%+) rise in ALK's stock price during 2010-2011. This was in response to the bubble in REE prices fostered by China's government. The bursting of the REE bubble, which was also fostered by China's government, caused ALK to lose all of its gains. It was an incredible round trip, not just for ALK but for all listed companies involved in the REE mining space. The difference is that most of the stocks that flew to great heights during the 2010-2011 REE bubble have since disappeared, whereas ALK has continued to move its project forward and is well positioned to benefit from a likely future improvement in commodity prices.

The following chart also shows that ALK's stock price has essentially flat-lined near the bottom of its 10-year range since the beginning of this year. This suggests that the current price is a relatively low-risk entry point. Higher prices for "specialty metals" and perhaps a lot of patience will be needed for new investors to achieve large profits, but buyers near today's price of A$0.21-$0.22 are unlikely to lose much money. The worst case is probably that the stock continues to do what it has been doing for the past 6 months, which is nothing.



The most efficient place to trade ALK is on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX), but the stock can also be traded Over-The-Counter (OTC) in the US as an American Depository Receipt (ADR) under the symbol ANLKY. One ADR is equivalent to 10 ordinary shares.

We always recommend AGAINST trading on the US OTC markets, but if you do attempt to trade ANLKY you should place a limit order that corresponds closely with the latest price on the ASX. For example, with ALK priced at A$0.22 on the ASX and an A$/US$ exchange rate of 0.75, the correct price for ANLKY would be about US$1.65 (10*A$0.22 converted to US$).

Chart Sources

Charts appearing in today's commentary are courtesy of:


http://stockcharts.com/index.html
http://www.barchart.com/

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/

<% Session("pass") = "pass" Session.Timeout = 480 ELSE Response.Redirect "market_logon.asp" END IF %>